Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 08:19:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu> To: "Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=" <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no> Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: IBM's cool disks Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980930081606.24134B-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu> In-Reply-To: <xzp7lyliwcy.fsf@grjottunagard.ifi.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I really have to agree here. I couldn't believe the difference between IBM DDRS-34560W and the ultra-wide 'cudas and atlas-I,II's that I have. I would be skeptical of the awesome viking-II's until they've been around a while and their firmware is proven reliable. My personal history with Quantum has been firmware hell. -c On 30 Sep 1998, Dag-Erling C. [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: > One more argument in favor of IBM disks is that they reputedly run > cooler and quieter than Quantum or Seagate disks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980930081606.24134B-100000>