Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:38:50 +1100 From: Andrew Kenneth Milton <akm@theinternet.com.au> To: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com> Cc: Jesper Louis Andersen <jlouis@mongers.org> Subject: Re: mtree vs tripwire Message-ID: <20040114183850.GM57209@zeus.theinternet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20040114182154.GA22444@sheol.localdomain> References: <20040114134215.GA21307@sheol.localdomain> <20040114180931.GA17074@miracle.mongers.org> <20040114182154.GA22444@sheol.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+-------[ D J Hawkey Jr ]---------------------- | On Jan 14, at 07:09 PM, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote: | > | > > This might seem really naive, but can mtree be used effectively as | > > a native-to-core-OS tripwire equivalent? Would it be as efficient in | > > terms of time-to-run and resource requirements? | > | > Pro: distributed with base | > Con: Only available for *BSD architectures as far as my knowledge goes. | | I'm aware of both, yes; hence my question. FreeBSD is all I'm dealing | with, where my question is concerned. | | Is your reply from personal experience, or is it the same "Hey, it | could..." as is my question? If the former, would you elaborate on the | implementation details? The manpage for mtree has an example... -- Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet| | Andrew Milton The Internet (Aust) Pty Ltd | M:+61 416 022 411 | ACN: 082 081 472 ABN: 83 082 081 472 |akm@theinternet.com.au| Carpe Daemon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040114183850.GM57209>