Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:15:21 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ensel Sharon <user@dhp.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: do known issues exist when snapshots used with quotas ? Message-ID: <20060314211521.GA43264@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0603141355200.8684-100000@shell.dhp.com> References: <20060314181302.GA40425@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0603141355200.8684-100000@shell.dhp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:05:24PM -0500, Ensel Sharon wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:10:27AM -0800, Arne Woerner wrote: > > > --- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:49:17PM -0500, Ensel Sharon wrote: > > > > > them) - just the quick question: are there any known issues / > > > > > suspicions / hunches / lore about bad things happening when > > > > > snapshots are combined with quotas ? > > > >=20 > > > > Yes - I've even posted as such on this very list in the past few > > > > days, so I don't know why you're asking again. > > > >=20 > > > Hmm... > > >=20 > > > When was it? I just found some messages (mostly about not further > > > specified bugs) > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-March/author.html > > >=20 > > > But nothing about quota... > > >=20 > > > Would be astonishing if snapshots have side effects on > > > quota-feature-use, I think... > >=20 > > Since in 6.0 a) snapshots have bugs, and b) quotas have bugs, it > > should be hardly surprising to you that snapshots have bugs with > > quotas. >=20 >=20 > I did not see any mention of quotas in the previous several days > discussion, but I am happy to know about it now. >=20 > What I _did see_ was: >=20 > > Thanks. There is an uncommitted patch being circulated that is > > believed to address all remaining problems. It relies on other fixes > > in -CURRENT that are not yet merged, but if you're able to test it let > > me know and I'll forward. >=20 > does this ^^^ patch also deal with the quota issues ? Yes. > Will this patch be in 6.1-RELEASE ? Yes, per my other reply. Kris --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEFzJpWry0BWjoQKURAu2TAKCYI+ywSPcyZE/SWCwLfj/37gpqNwCeKvH5 NZ7jox3U1Oenq60otDtf3BI= =Pjut -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060314211521.GA43264>