Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 03:29:35 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, bde@zeta.org.au, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970605032630.3370C-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <9456.865466424@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Jun 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > At any rate, I suggest you back out the change and ask Jordan for > > review. This is clearly his region as it concerns the release and not > > only "make world". > > I'd like to argue for the introduction of SHARED=copies as the > hard-wired behavior. If we're ever to create a more compartmentalized > system, as everyone is ranting for, then we need to decouple things > like "bin" and "src". I see most unpleasant case with current method is potential /sys & /usr/include files mispatch (in case someone bump kernel file limit f.e.) and possible missing availability of some kernel deeper level directories from user program, I suggest to keep symlinks as they are in source case and extract only *.h files from kernel source to /sys to prevent bloating. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970605032630.3370C-100000>