Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:51:24 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BSNMPD: several (cosmetic?) problems Message-ID: <1192096458.20130408155124@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304081338160.34115@KNOP-BEAGLE.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <563362676.20130407121102@serebryakov.spb.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304081338160.34115@KNOP-BEAGLE.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Harti. You wrote 8 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 15:40:07: LS>>(1) I have a lot of "could not encode error response" in LS>>/var/log/messages after change of hardware. It looks like, every LS>>request from mrtg for "unexistent" interface leads to this message. LS>>I'll reconfigure mrtg, of course, but it is annoying. HB> I think this is a problem I have already got a patch for from Steryana, HB> but did not manage yet to test. If it is that problem, then it is not= =20 HB> entirely cosmetic, because the daemon fails to send error responses in HB> many cases. Could you send this patch to me for test? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1192096458.20130408155124>