Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:36:48 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Gabriel Dragffy <gabe@dragffy.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hunks failed, is this bad? Message-ID: <46E72690.8020707@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <E415058D-8E16-4634-B6E4-3166988F156B@dragffy.com> References: <E415058D-8E16-4634-B6E4-3166988F156B@dragffy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gabriel Dragffy wrote: > Hi all > > I hope you can help me. > > I have a clean install of freebsd. I changed to /usr and made ports > directory. Then I ran portsnap fetch and then extract. Then I changed to > ports-mngmt/portmanager and did make install clean. > > When I try to install any port using either 'make install clean' or > 'portmanager www/lighttpd' (for example) I see hunks failed in stdout. > As an exaple I saw one of these flas by when installing lighttpd: > > |--- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Tue Nov 8 01:02:51 2005 > |+++ bsd.port.mk Wed Nov 16 02:16:57 2005 > -------------------------- > Patching file bsd.port.mk using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 2049. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--s > > As far as I can tell I see similar errors no matter what port I try to > install. Is this a problem? Yes, and it doesn't make much sense either. Nothing should be patching bsd.port.mk on the fly, and the date of 2005 is also suspicious. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46E72690.8020707>