Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:54:31 +0200 From: Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> To: Stanislaw Halik <sthalik@tehran.lain.pl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GELI issues ? (Re: Increase in panics under 6.1) Message-ID: <20060527105431.534bce7b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060526140245.GA46056@tehran.lain.pl> References: <20060524115659.7895006a@localhost> <20060524020116.GB54710@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060526013105.22ee47ad@localhost> <20060525181528.59c423e7@localhost> <20060526140245.GA46056@tehran.lain.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Stanislaw Halik <sthalik@tehran.lain.pl> wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > >> Interestingly enough , i had some nasty issues todays on same > >> laptop. I had 2 x 6 GB GELI vnodes, running mtree -K md5digest to > >> compare contents. Disk IO was high as expected...but then it just > >> died down (but the mtree hadnt finished). > >> (swap is also GELI) > > >> Any subsequent process trying to access the encrypted mount points > >> simply stalled for as long as I cared to wait (10 minutes). The > >> processes even stalled a shutdown -r. > > I'm not sure if it's related, but I lately see this behaviour on > > NFS mounts if the server is not responding. > > > Doing cd /mnt/mydeadnfsmount/[tab for autocompletion] > > is enough to render the current console unresponsive. > > Isn't that normal and desired for `hard' mounts? Now that you mention it I guess your right. It totally forgot that hard mounts are the default. Fabian -- http://www.fabiankeil.de/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEeBPPjV8GA4rMKUQRAs9tAJ0TgZGFoMF2T3bCyeUyNmzeKkhhvACgjIy4 FKNCEvzLYjHSblVc8YWx7iE= =UR3p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060527105431.534bce7b>