Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:53:59 +0200 From: =?windows-1257?B?TGl1ZGFzIEJha/B5cw==?= <liudasb@centras.lt> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 BETA 2 vs Opensolaris vs Ubuntu performance Message-ID: <20081125095359.19E70100A6C4@mascareta.delfi.lt>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--===================_4606496OH==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hello, I did some calculations to take into account not only best result, but how much it is better. I used following formulas: If more is better then result/max(ubuntu, opensolaris, freebsd) If less is better then min(ubuntu, opensolaris, freebsd)/ result Results in phoronix article Ubuntu OpenSolaris FreeBSD LAME Encoding 43,3 53,51 45,87 7-Zip Compression 10612 9655,99 9323,66 Timed Gzip Compression 111,08 116,54 122,32 GnuPG 43,49 62,39 44,72 Tandem XML 30,89 54,52 29,01 Bork File Encrypter 78,4 55,31 79,36 Java SciMark FFT 455,53 480,93 447,24 Java SciMark matrix mul. 549,16 438,25 543,02 Java SciMark SOR 742,77 734 731,22 Java SciMark Montecarlo 162,11 167,89 160,53 Sunflow rendering 6,24 6,57 5,62 Bonnie++ seq 34861 61387 56124 Bonnie++ rand read 50511 60626 56255 Bonnie++ rand del 209,3 362,4 145,4 BYTE dhrystone 8604934,5 7486935,6 12122380,5 BYTE register 553949 555089,5 547974,3 BYTE fp 1284795 933096,5 1271991,7 Results after calculations Ubuntu OpenSolaris FreeBSD 1 0,81 0,94 1 0,91 0,88 1 0,95 0,91 1 0,7 0,97 0,94 0,53 1 0,71 1 0,7 0,95 1 0,93 1 0,8 0,99 1 0,99 0,98 0,97 1 0,96 0,9 0,86 1 0,57 1 0,91 0,83 1 0,93 0,58 1 0,4 0,71 0,62 1 1 1 0,99 1 0,73 0,99 SUM 15,14 14,89 15,48 AVERAGE 0,89 0,88 0,91 I hope results are readable -- Liudas >At 03:28 PM 11/24/2008, Steven Hartland wrote: >>http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php? page=article&item=os_threeway_2008&num=1 >> >>Was interesting until I saw this:- >> >>"However, it's important to reiterate that all three operating >>systems were left in their stock configurations and that no >>additional tweaking had occurred." > >They all seem to be fairly close in the majority of tests. > >In the conclusion they write, "In our LAME MP3 encoding test, Ubuntu >8.10 was the fastest followed by FreeBSD 7.1".... One needs to >consider, the difference was 2%... Thats hardly anything to get >excited about, especially if that difference can be accounted for by >how much priority the scheduler gives to a userland app vs what the >system is doing etc.... > >Also, it would have been interesting to see more multithreaded work >loads. A lot of the apps they tested seemed to be single threaded, >doing one job. > > ---Mike > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance- unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --===================_4606496OH==_--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081125095359.19E70100A6C4>