Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 22:29:33 +0800 From: k simon <chio1990@gmail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is your favourite/best firewall on FreeBSD and why? Message-ID: <537F5B4D.4060205@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <FE050654-7AE7-4E5D-B191-9A620B9D61AD@tao.org.uk> References: <20140520070926.GA92183@The.ie> <lln2o2$77d$1@usenet.ziemba.us> <FE050654-7AE7-4E5D-B191-9A620B9D61AD@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does FB exist some methods can log the ClientIp\NatIp\ServerIp tuple when using ipfw nat ? Regards Simon δΊ 14-5-23 18:04, Dr Josef Karthauser ει: > On 23 May 2014, at 10:00, G. Paul Ziemba <pz-freebsd-stable@ziemba.us> wrote: > >> Lucius.Rizzo@The.ie (Lucius Rizzo) writes: >> >>> Ultimately, outside configuration differences all firewalls are essentially >>> serve the same purpose but I wonder what is your favorite and why? If >>> you were to run FreeBSD in production, which of the three would you >>> choose? IPFilter, PF or IPFW? >> >> I switched to pf about seven months ago as I began to need to >> manage bandwidth for specific classes of traffic (for example, >> prevent outbound mailing list email from saturating the link >> and reserve some bandwidth for interactive use). >> >> The syntax is very close and the NAT configuration is simpler in pf. > > Does the pfsync handle NAT tables. > Could I use it to build a resilient carrier grade NAT solution? > > Joe >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?537F5B4D.4060205>