Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:29:45 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext Message-ID: <425A3579.2138.171B7898@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050411152310.1fea4df6@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <425A32C8.30080.1710F6F5@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Apr 2005 at 15:23, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400 > "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> wrote: > > > On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > > > obrien 2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit: > > [ ... ] > > Next time I won't bother to make a list then :) > > flz has fixed a few, but pav suggest that the obrien might want to > back-out the commit so he won't fix more of them until obrien decides. FreshPorts does a sanity check for each port in a commit. Any failures are emailed to the comitter if the comitter opts in. To opt in, register using your @FreeBSD.org email address at http://www.freshports.org/ Is there any value in making sanity test failures publicly available? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ NEW brochure available at http://www.bsdcan.org/2005/advocacy/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?425A3579.2138.171B7898>