Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:53:03 +0100 From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr/local/etc/shells Message-ID: <20010127125303.647601ef.steveo@eircom.net> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010127002713.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20010127091814.567fda08.steveo@eircom.net> <XFMail.010127002713.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:27:13 -0800 (PST) John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: JB> How many contrib'd apps need to look at /etc/shells? The biggest one I think JB> is sendmail, and Greg Shapiro is a very reasonable fellow, and can probably JB> assist in getting sendmail at least to use the API as long as it isn't too JB> inconvenient. I feel encouraged. The other are it turns up is in the crypto section crypto/heimdal/lib/roken/getusershell.c and /crypto/kerberosIV/lib/roken/getusershell.c I think these are the same. The getusershell seems to be the API to use. It will probably have to be redone in perl for adduser.perl but that's no great problem. Now for the bikeshed question .include or #include ? BTW: I did consider cpp or m4 *briefly*. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010127125303.647601ef.steveo>