Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:05:06 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel-lucent.com> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SVN for ports Message-ID: <20120717000506.GA45623@pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <5003701B.7070706@missouri.edu> References: <5003701B.7070706@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Jul-16 11:36:27 +1000, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.e= du> wrote: >1. Does anyone anticipate wanting a ctm-svn-ports, or will ctm-ports be= =20 >enough? Speaking for myself, no but you might want to see how popular ctm-svn is - I'm not sure if any "official" SVN mirrors exist so CTM may make a useful tool for replicating the SVN repos (though it's not really publicised). >2. At some point, I would like to stop creating deltas for ctm-cvs.=20 >These deltas take a long time (an hour or two) for my computer to=20 >create. (It takes about a minute to create ctm-svn deltas.) Will this=20 >upset people? It won't upset me. I suggest you monitor the mailing list and FTP downloads (talk to the various mirror admins) and see how popular they still are. The only reason I can see for sticking with CVS would be disk space. The SVN repository is about 4x the size of the CVS repository. --=20 Peter Jeremy --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlAErDIACgkQ/opHv/APuIfSGgCglNv9Zi1yEOK8GDzI6xovZD91 4vAAniIlHyBSa6gGl4qjTJjWS/NwYArD =2Lhp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120717000506.GA45623>