Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:44:14 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Spartak Radchenko <spartak@aif.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why? Message-ID: <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru> References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org> <20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are >> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th >> performs atrociously: >> >> neptune# netstat -ni | head >> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs >> Coll >> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1 >> 10858513 > > I have no problems with em: > >> netstat -ni | head > Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll > em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 0 0 > >> uname -rs > FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3 Against what type of switch? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040810184401.V776>