Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:33:03 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/net if_faith.c if_loop.croute.h rtsock.c src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c in_pcb.h in_rmx.c ip_divert.c ip_fw2.c ip_icmp.c ip_input.c ip_output.c Message-ID: <20031121002621.N1924@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <3FBD596E.CE7299BD@freebsd.org> References: <20031120200816.1F8C916A4DD@hub.freebsd.org> <20031120154119.M72721@root.org> <3FBD596E.CE7299BD@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Andre Oppermann wrote: > BTW: Is there a reason why we haven't enabled rfc3390 and inflight by > default? I'm running all my (ISP) servers with it and it gives quite > a boost, especially with http traffic. The inflight stuff is also very > good for connections where the remote side has only limited bandwidth. > It doesn't overload the remote path buffer and keeps the traffic smooth > instead of hitting the packet loss and trying again. > > -- > Andre We should probably put 3390 on soon, it was just me objecting before. I'm not so sure about inflight, though; it probably needs more verification before it's turned on by default. I'm looking forward to dynamic sockbuf sizing though, I think it's a prereq for the inflight code to be well tested. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031121002621.N1924>