Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 00:29:03 -0500 From: Tim Tsai <tim@futuresouth.com> To: am@f1.ru Cc: Allen Smith <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu>, bofh@terranova.net, greg@uswest.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI problems? Message-ID: <19980512002903.24456@futuresouth.com> In-Reply-To: <199805112042.AAA18647@px.f1.ru>; from Andrew Maltsev on Tue, May 12, 1998 at 12:42:34AM %2B0400 References: <9805111615.ZM3202@beatrice.rutgers.edu> <199805112042.AAA18647@px.f1.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 12, 1998 at 12:42:34AM +0400, Andrew Maltsev wrote: > > On May 11, 1:43pm, Tim Tsai (possibly) wrote: > > > We haven't seen any of the Adaptec problems since we turned off all > > > the AHC_ options in the kernel configuration file. > > > > Aren't those for EISA, not PCI devices in the first place? That's what > > the comments in LINT seem to indicate. I've also got an 2940UW, > > without any AHC_ options, and it hasn't been causing any problems - > > then again, the machine hasn't been up and running very long. > > Hm.. Powered off it will cause even less problems. Without tagging it's > too slow for UW and good HD.. For some of us reliability is far more important than speed. I bet you mount your filesystem async too huh? > Btw, I see no more of that disturbing messages when I added AUTO_EOI1 > and BOUNCE_BUFFERS which I lost during upgrade.. Hmmm, can somebody tell me why BOUNCE_BUFFERS is applicable here? These are PCI devices. Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980512002903.24456>