Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:11:40 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New libutil function: parse_capacity(3). Message-ID: <20040917041139.GB52634@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040917040445.GA52078@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20040916184201.GD30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040917040445.GA52078@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Sep 17), Alexey Dokuchaev said: > Methinks you could probably come up with a better name, since > "engeneering number mode" (using K, M, T, etc) is used for bandwidth, > for instance, not just for `capacity'. IMHO. Making it that user > can easily guess its name from already-there humanize_number(3). dehumanize_number? :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040917041139.GB52634>