Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:50:31 +0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?Mina_Gali=C4=87?= <freebsd@igalic.co> To: "emaste@freebsd.org" <emaste@freebsd.org>, "imp@bsdimp.com" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Re: Removing fdisk and bsdlabel (legacy partition tools) Message-ID: <E0wRsk-5NPyMz16fk2lz8i2tYZ38T-gSOa_iAFsN8frOlYG8HxFJW-ZXHhGydmtQJGwNo8vXIaJXz2ZkEoee_9gslehz85geiD45zqRlbpk=@igalic.co> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2AmNmc54G66XHCnaZkgsDcbJT%2BpCi0ys=YVrPUTkX8BYQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyFy2CK0Vq8U6J-H4XU3pNA33-uKAxUoNOAbM9SdSFa0Bcqkg@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfoYEJvp3R%2Be=%2B=Brm=WmRTPxeOooS004dnNLupjQnodEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyFy2AmNmc54G66XHCnaZkgsDcbJT%2BpCi0ys=YVrPUTkX8BYQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > Those are the only users in the tree, but not for long :) > > I have some reviews open to remove some old fdisk / diskabel / > bsdlabel invocations from the tree. > > With those applied, for fdisk I see the following references > (excluding sbin/fdisk/* and comments, old examples, etc.): > > contrib/netbsd-tests/sbin/gpt/t_gpt.sh > tests/sys/cddl/zfs/bin/zpool_smi.ksh > > For bsdlabel / disklabel: > > sbin/growfs/tests/legacy_test.pl > tools/regression/msdosfs/msdosfstest-2.sh > tools/regression/tmpfs/t_vnd > tools/tools/nanobsd/legacy.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/kernel/t_umount.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/kernel/t_umountstress.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/sbin/gpt/t_gpt.sh > sbin/newfs/runtest00.sh > sbin/newfs/runtest01.sh i was looking at cd(4) today, and to my surprise, it was full of disklabel references. I haven't looked at the code itself yet, to see how far the documentation has drifted apart from reality, but to most users, our documentation is reality.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wRsk-5NPyMz16fk2lz8i2tYZ38T-gSOa_iAFsN8frOlYG8HxFJW-ZXHhGydmtQJGwNo8vXIaJXz2ZkEoee_9gslehz85geiD45zqRlbpk=>