Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:50:31 +0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?Mina_Gali=C4=87?= <freebsd@igalic.co> To: "emaste@freebsd.org" <emaste@freebsd.org>, "imp@bsdimp.com" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Re: Removing fdisk and bsdlabel (legacy partition tools) Message-ID: <E0wRsk-5NPyMz16fk2lz8i2tYZ38T-gSOa_iAFsN8frOlYG8HxFJW-ZXHhGydmtQJGwNo8vXIaJXz2ZkEoee_9gslehz85geiD45zqRlbpk=@igalic.co> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2AmNmc54G66XHCnaZkgsDcbJT%2BpCi0ys=YVrPUTkX8BYQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyFy2CK0Vq8U6J-H4XU3pNA33-uKAxUoNOAbM9SdSFa0Bcqkg@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfoYEJvp3R%2Be=%2B=Brm=WmRTPxeOooS004dnNLupjQnodEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyFy2AmNmc54G66XHCnaZkgsDcbJT%2BpCi0ys=YVrPUTkX8BYQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > Those are the only users in the tree, but not for long :) > > I have some reviews open to remove some old fdisk / diskabel / > bsdlabel invocations from the tree. > > With those applied, for fdisk I see the following references > (excluding sbin/fdisk/* and comments, old examples, etc.): > > contrib/netbsd-tests/sbin/gpt/t_gpt.sh > tests/sys/cddl/zfs/bin/zpool_smi.ksh > > For bsdlabel / disklabel: > > sbin/growfs/tests/legacy_test.pl > tools/regression/msdosfs/msdosfstest-2.sh > tools/regression/tmpfs/t_vnd > tools/tools/nanobsd/legacy.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/kernel/t_umount.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/kernel/t_umountstress.sh > contrib/netbsd-tests/sbin/gpt/t_gpt.sh > sbin/newfs/runtest00.sh > sbin/newfs/runtest01.sh i was looking at cd(4) today, and to my surprise, it was full of disklabel references. I haven't looked at the code itself yet, to see how far the documentation has drifted apart from reality, but to most users, our documentation is reality.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wRsk-5NPyMz16fk2lz8i2tYZ38T-gSOa_iAFsN8frOlYG8HxFJW-ZXHhGydmtQJGwNo8vXIaJXz2ZkEoee_9gslehz85geiD45zqRlbpk=>