Date: 24 Oct 2001 20:02:29 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules Makefile src/sys/modules/apm Makefile Message-ID: <xzp6694zzka.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <200110241653.f9OGrsL58421@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200110241653.f9OGrsL58421@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Log: > Make apm a module. > We need further work to be able to specify an equivalence of `flags 0x20'. > Many PCs should work for now. But, some PCs need `flags 0x20'. I know that "flags 0x20" means "broken statclock", but can you tell me what symptoms a machine with a broken statclock would exhibit if that flag were not set? Also, are there any disadvantages to setting that flag on a machine that does not need it? This should be in the man page - but it does not even mention that setting, and the SYNOPSIS section says "device apm0 at nexus?" instead of simply "device apm" DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp6694zzka.fsf>