Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:51:58 -0600 (MDT) From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com> To: Steve Kaczkowski <steve@inc.net> Cc: InvictaNet Customer Support <support@invictanet.co.uk>, Freebsd-ISP <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Telnet restrictions Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009121550280.26689-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> In-Reply-To: <39BEB156.AC49A795@inc.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Steve Kaczkowski wrote: > I'd check into both to see which would work better in your situation, > tcp_wrappers will do it for you, but you can get much more creative > with Ipfilter since it's a full firewalling package.. The other non-quantifyable advantage is that ipfilter/ipfw (whichever) rejects the connection at a much lower level - logically, this would indicate that ipfilter/ipfw *might* be more secure.... - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009121550280.26689-100000>