Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 22:35:14 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Ulrich_Sp=C3=B6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org>, git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports 2020Q3 branch not present? Message-ID: <CANCZdfr843KeRyYNgiLDDskEanS=8%2Bj6cUWPXY6gJP_Rx_zk5g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200711205804.GA22050@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20200710212416.GA89164@freefall.freebsd.org> <20200711093659.GA16439@acme.spoerlein.net> <20200711205804.GA22050@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 2:58 PM Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hmm, so currently the quarterly (and older releng) branches are directly > under > the "remotes" origin, just like master itself. This makes switching between > branches easy, which comes in handy for MFHs I think. > They are just like the stable branches in the src tree (or somewhat similar), so I think they should be the same, and pulled by default. While they are quarterly, the traffic on them is smaller than a typical stable branch in src, so it's not a huge amount of extra revisions. The only way to find the size is to pull with and without them and observe the difference. Warnerhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfr843KeRyYNgiLDDskEanS=8%2Bj6cUWPXY6gJP_Rx_zk5g>