Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 22:35:14 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Ulrich_Sp=C3=B6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org>, git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports 2020Q3 branch not present? Message-ID: <CANCZdfr843KeRyYNgiLDDskEanS=8%2Bj6cUWPXY6gJP_Rx_zk5g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200711205804.GA22050@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20200710212416.GA89164@freefall.freebsd.org> <20200711093659.GA16439@acme.spoerlein.net> <20200711205804.GA22050@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 2:58 PM Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hmm, so currently the quarterly (and older releng) branches are directly > under > the "remotes" origin, just like master itself. This makes switching between > branches easy, which comes in handy for MFHs I think. > They are just like the stable branches in the src tree (or somewhat similar), so I think they should be the same, and pulled by default. While they are quarterly, the traffic on them is smaller than a typical stable branch in src, so it's not a huge amount of extra revisions. The only way to find the size is to pull with and without them and observe the difference. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfr843KeRyYNgiLDDskEanS=8%2Bj6cUWPXY6gJP_Rx_zk5g>