Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:33:26 +0200
From:      Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SoC 2009: BSD-licensed libiconv in base system
Message-ID:  <20090427193326.GA7654@britannica.bec.de>
In-Reply-To: <49F5FE45.2090101@freebsd.org>
References:  <aa9f273a8313c6436e76fa9f5d587ef4.squirrel@webmail.kovesdan.org> <20090427183836.GA10793@zim.MIT.EDU> <49F5FE45.2090101@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:49:41AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> David Schultz wrote:
>> ... whether it would make more sense to standardize on something like
>> UCS-4 for the internal representation.
>
> YES.  Without this, wchar_t is useless.

I strongly disagree. Everything can be represented as UCS-4 is a bad
assumption, but something Americans and Europeans naturally don't have
to care about.

Joerg



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090427193326.GA7654>