Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:59:33 +0900 From: taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCL's plus patches Message-ID: <14388.44805.503480.29321F@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:38:18 -0500 (EST)" <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911181938000.46369-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <14388.43339.834504.26482Z@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911181938000.46369-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > If it's backwards compatable like you say it is, I see no reason for > another port. Plus patch documents say: All changes are 100% upwards compatible with the corresponding offical Tcl/Tk releases. And I've already contacted to the auther, Jan Nijtmans. He said there are no probrem if we use/distribute plus patch as ports/packages. Taguchi, Takeshi. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14388.44805.503480.29321F>