Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:53:49 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy Message-ID: <20000702135349.F96427@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200007021744.KAA34748@john.baldwin.cx>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 10:44:22AM -0700 References: <20000702114353.C19714@freebie.wbnet> <200007021744.KAA34748@john.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 10:44:22AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> compile/ - no change
> >
> > I'd change this into compile/${MACHINE_ARCH} so that a single shared source
> > tree can be used to build [alpha,i386] kernels. In the current setup one
> > gets clashes with GENERIC etc.
AS much as I hate this idea, I have to support it strongly.
> Sounds good to me actually. Although, should it be ${MACHINE_ARCH}/compile
> instead in keeping with the mentioned goal of keeping all MD stuff under
> ${MACHINE_ARCH}?
I would prefer /sys/compile/<ARCH> as it makes it easier to make a
symlink to another place. Unless of course we get /usr/obj working for
kernel compiles....
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000702135349.F96427>