Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Sat, 21 Feb 2026 02:37:00 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org>
To:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The future of lpr and lpd
Message-ID:  <86qzqex4g3.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
In-Reply-To: <86wm07xnre.fsf@ltc.des.dev> ("Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8r?= =?utf-8?Q?grav=22's?= message of "Fri, 20 Feb 2026 19:39:49 %2B0100")
References:  <86wm07xnre.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> It would be extremely helpful if those of you who are using base lpr /
> lpd today could take the time to try out the lprng package / the
> print/lprng port (which should be a drop-in replacement) and let me know
> if there is any loss of functionality.

Sorry, it's actually LPRng (sysutils/LPRng), not lprng (print/lprng),
because that would have been too sensible.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.org
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86qzqex4g3.fsf>