Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 06:52:27 +0000 From: Michael Ranner <mranner@inode.at> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4 Message-ID: <200503070652.27496.mranner@inode.at> In-Reply-To: <DDE9BD25F957493B50EE49C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr> References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <874qfpupk5.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <DDE9BD25F957493B50EE49C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Sonntag, 6. M=E4rz 2005 08:58 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: > > I find that pretty strange, I'll be thinking that it should be at least as > fast, if not faster, I'll make some tests this week. I have observed a similar problem: I am using nullfs for make buildworld fo= r=20 years without no problem and less performance impact but using nullfs for=20 Apache you can observe some huge performance breakdown. So i cant use nullf= s=20 for Apche chroot or similar. Probably he should use NFS f=FCr his jail. Regards =2D-=20 /\/\ichael Ranner mranner@inode.at - mranner@jawa.at - mranner@bugat.at =2D---------------------------------------------------- BSD Usergroup Austria - http://www.bugat.at/ =2D----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GIT/CS/AT dx(-) s+:(++:) a- C++ UBLVS++++$ P++>+++$ L-(+)$ E--- W+++$ N+(++) o-- K- w--()$ O-(--) M@ V-(--) PS+>++ PE(-) Y+ PGP(-) t+ 5+ X+++(++++) R* tv++ b+(++) DI++ D-(--) G- e h--(*) r++ y? =2D-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503070652.27496.mranner>