Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:56:13 +0100 From: Julian Stecklina <jsteckli@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS panic on Google Compute Engine Message-ID: <52CFD1CD.4080106@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> In-Reply-To: <1707777342.1513.1389337638314.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> References: <lajo13$2g6$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAB7-odkZAGxgtfnqNwNaCfqXcY0nmbFPdf3NtFYkwGUictJcyw@mail.gmail.com> <20140108193938.GA19267@neutralgood.org> <1389235686.3057.4.camel@janus.xn--pl-wia.net> <52CE92F8.9040801@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <1707777342.1513.1389337638314.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --20OUjU2jPANnaWHwm1CGmjoKnrWVeLt2t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/10/2014 08:07 AM, Bryan Venteicher wrote: > What happens when you try to portsnap fetch extract locally? I haven't Works without a problem. > I've been meaning to spin up some GCE instances to try out. I'll try > to get do that this weekend. That would be great. I've been using f1-micro instances. I've also seen timing problems when FreeBSD selects TSC as timecounter (the default). Time would run at 1/3 the normal speed, unless I switch to ACPI-safe, even though FreeBSD reports invariant TSC: kern.timecounter.invariant_tsc: 1 I wonder whether the latter is a KVM bug on Google's end. Julian --20OUjU2jPANnaWHwm1CGmjoKnrWVeLt2t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlLP0c0ACgkQ2EtjUdW3H9lw8wCfReMQelx30K7rAF28clim8ApX Qn8An1iC3vEVMfLjNe2xJ+T5PUowIfwk =IHsW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --20OUjU2jPANnaWHwm1CGmjoKnrWVeLt2t--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52CFD1CD.4080106>