Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:10:24 -0400 From: Randall Stewart <rrs@cisco.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KTR and SCTP Message-ID: <4670B1A0.4070706@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <20070614022510.GA61989@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <46706E63.1080906@cisco.com> <20070614022510.GA61989@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:23:31PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: > >>All: >> >>I am in the process of converting all the logging that >>SCTP does to use the KTR sub-system. This will fit >>nicely.. I still need to do some things to make it >>so I can pull out the logs and make pretty charts and >>graphs (in SCTP its used for debugging but also exploring >>how CC and other niceties works).. >> >>But I was wondering.. would anyone mind if I took >>KTR_SPARE2 >> >>and made it: >> >>KTR_SCTP_SUBSYS >> >>I have a huge amount of tracing under SCTP now.. so >>many I am setting in a seperate mask set to enable/disable >>various pieces of it.. So I was thinking it would >>warrent a sub-system of its own :-D >> >>Any objections? If not I will change it :-D > > > Yeah, we really do need to keep those spare fields for local use. > > Kris > Ok.. so I will just use KTR_SPARE2 in my logs then I guess.. :-) R -- Randall Stewart NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc. 803-345-0369 <or> 803-317-4952 (cell)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4670B1A0.4070706>