Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 07:15:49 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Moving MIPS to Tier 2 Message-ID: <CANCZdfr-_Ea53YuVFPrum0JSRWHUrF4L02xczoQeqZMqxyzg_g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2795156.1ZxtyVf0ta@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <2795156.1ZxtyVf0ta@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 8, 2017 9:55 PM, "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: While reviewing the Tier document in the committers guide I noticed that mips is currently listed as Tier 2. I thought it was tier 3. Is this a typo? However, I think it probably meets the definition for Tier 2 (it not in external source code control for example) and even some features of Tier 1 (cross-built packages are available). One note is that Tier 2 does require 3 active developers, but I think we probably have that. What do other folks think? I think we are close enough. Most things work, but not all. We have more rough edges in MIPS than any other mainstream FreeBSD port. However, the rough edges are consistent with where arm was a few years ago on it's path to being nearly tier 1. Warner -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-mips@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mips To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mips-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfr-_Ea53YuVFPrum0JSRWHUrF4L02xczoQeqZMqxyzg_g>