Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 14:11:51 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in pthread_cancel() Message-ID: <20020501121151.GR66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10204302325260.7256-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <200204302302.g3UN2aS89479@arch20m.dellroad.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10204302325260.7256-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20020501 05:45], Daniel Eischen (eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com) wrote: >Hmm, what about just bypassing the pthread_cancel() if the >thread is already in the process of exiting? Makes sense to me. And the testcase in the PR is solved adequately with it? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / Kita no Mono asmodai@wxs.nl, finger asmodai@ninth-circle.org http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/ | http://www.tendra.org/ Everything Zen, I don't think so... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020501121151.GR66061>