Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 21:21:00 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Mr M P Searle <csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk> Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: matrox millenium / XFree86 3.3 xbench results 8) Message-ID: <199706110421.VAA00570@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Jun 1997 13:31:13 BST." <2477.199706101231@wrasse.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
awk -f scripts/xstones.awk < results//matrox-1100.run
TOTAL 1066823 lineStones
TOTAL 434861 fillStones
TOTAL 155673 blitStones
TOTAL 57203637 arcStones
TOTAL 3278002 textStones
TOTAL 598692 complexStones
TOTAL 496071 xStones
resolution 1152x864 32bit color depth
Amancio
>From The Desk Of Mr M P Searle :
> > {hasty} awk -f scripts/xstones.awk < results/matrox.run
> > TOTAL 1947365 lineStones
> > TOTAL 964984 fillStones
> > TOTAL 452761 blitStones
> > TOTAL 61404537 arcStones
> > TOTAL 3285909 textStones
> > TOTAL 993398 complexStones
> > TOTAL 1139709 xStones
> > ^^^^^^^
> > I am in love !
> >
> > resolution 1280x1024 color depth: 8
> >
> > Not too long ago X servers based on et4000 used to clock in around 10 to
> > 15k xstones. In such a short time to get this kind of performance
> > is almost a miracle .
> >
>
> But why run it in 8bpp? (Have you got any figures for 16 or 24bpp?)
>
> BTW, I'm fairly sure this is more than Xi claim for the Millenium, the
> fastest card under AccelX. IIRC AccelX/Millenium does 1.0-1.1 MxStones.
> They also have no numbers for higher bpps...
>
> Thanks, Michael.
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706110421.VAA00570>