Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:04:13 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg Message-ID: <2BC7B022-4392-4AE4-84F7-6A0573EEFEC7@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20131218205026.GA1442@tiny-r255948> References: <20131218205026.GA1442@tiny-r255948>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 18 Dec 2013, at 21:50, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote: > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the > system before with some binary packages, only based on base system and > sources? Use portsnap, or if you use 10.x or later, the base system has svnlite. -Dimitry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlKyDdEACgkQsF6jCi4glqM1AACfTKyVWIl7vFojfxe1iuM4bghh b68AnRG1Se9GBJHdeEgE4RTFuEMETGfA =5YCj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2BC7B022-4392-4AE4-84F7-6A0573EEFEC7>