Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:23:37 -0800 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r312988 - in head/sys: compat/cloudabi compat/linux kern sys Message-ID: <20170201182337.GG3334@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3349880.lYJPXOWCO7@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <201701301257.v0UCvNrK065993@repo.freebsd.org> <3349880.lYJPXOWCO7@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:13:36PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: J> On Monday, January 30, 2017 12:57:23 PM Edward Tomasz Napierala wrote: J> > Author: trasz J> > Date: Mon Jan 30 12:57:22 2017 J> > New Revision: 312988 J> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/312988 J> > J> > Log: J> > Add kern_listen(), kern_shutdown(), and kern_socket(), and use them J> > instead of their sys_*() counterparts in various compats. The svr4 J> > is left untouched, because there's no point. J> J> Note that you can compile test svr4 since it is still in the tree. J> If we want to remove svr4, then we should remove it. However, we J> should maintain code that is in the tree if it is still there. All we can do right now is maintain it as compilable. My example with COMPAT_OLDSOCK shows that SVR4 simply doesn't work as kld, and nobody complains. Okay, what if I say on freebsd-arch/freebsd-current that I am going to remove it and wait for any objections for a month, and then do it? -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170201182337.GG3334>