Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:24:14 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Charles M. Hannum" <abuse@spamalicious.com> Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: FUD about CGD and GBDE Message-ID: <3174.1110108254@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:06:04 GMT." <200503052106.05001.abuse@spamalicious.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200503052106.05001.abuse@spamalicious.com>, "Charles M. Hannum" wri tes: >While you might claim that the dedication to study the user's behavior and >mount such an attack is fanciful, I claim that it is not. Under observation, >GBDE's additional techniques do not stand up to the claim of being "spook >strength". GBDE only makes that claim for a "cold disk" for pretty much the very reasons you mention. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3174.1110108254>