Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 21:36:04 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r384106 - head/Mk/Uses Message-ID: <55355524.3080907@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <CACM2dAa4HdNZJ2VaRj1SCS%2BrXB2YJpPy%2BTVhxh-enUu-kDw7QA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201504161244.t3GCiHF4040177@svn.freebsd.org> <CACM2dAb1NtKU9ZGmuf94rZeHi4izJ0-=noARB3eci%2BKZOWCBGw@mail.gmail.com> <20150420170954.GF960@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CACM2dAa4HdNZJ2VaRj1SCS%2BrXB2YJpPy%2BTVhxh-enUu-kDw7QA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/20/2015 21:03, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Could you point lua@ to ports@ ? The goal really is to have a central > place for lua ports (other than ports@). > > I don't really care one way or the other, I just hate to see large > groups of ports sit a ports@ that need coordination / standards. I disagree with this suggestion. In that case, lua maintenance will be hindered by a phantom team. People tend to avoid team ports because there's always the fear there is some big exp-run brewing (big hidden picture). lua has a much better chance of being maintained as ports@ in this case, IMO. There won't be the uncertainty of the unknown / hand-slap. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55355524.3080907>