Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Dec 1997 07:44:13 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
To:        jamil@acroal.com (J. Weatherbee - Senior Systems Architect)
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: This IS relevant, you'll realize why later.
Message-ID:  <199712111244.HAA03778@dyson.iquest.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971211001823.29711A-100000@acroal.com> from "J. Weatherbee - Senior Systems Architect" at "Dec 11, 97 00:41:09 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
J. Weatherbee - Senior Systems Architect said:
> 
> 
> Does anyone have any numbers for the sum total amount of information
> existing in the universe?  I would guess the appropriate way to tablulate
> this would be to take the total ammount of matter in the form of subatomic
> particles, and energy is photons and account for their position in three
> coordinates and velocity vector.  I'm certainly no physicist, but from
> what I've read there are *NO* numbers for the ammount of matter in the
> universe just percentage approximations.  My guess is that you could
> account for
> this all in less than 2^1000 bits = 10^300, what this essentially means to
> me is that it would be impractical to build a machine with a word size
> expressed with more that 1024 bits (the expression of the word size, not
> the wordsize itself).  
> 
I don't think that is big enough. :-).


-- 
John
dyson@freebsd.org
jdyson@nc.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712111244.HAA03778>