Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:13:08 -0600 From: Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> To: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? Message-ID: <54BBE9A4.80300@my.hennepintech.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAE63ME474RefGOK=30sja4XPF3JOVAbdK64YaOai3ZmnoP%2BJtw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAE63ME7Qv-99-3OvCnj3gm4-4rHrO2cGjVvQOPBvuO-JNSi5Yg@mail.gmail.com> <54BA8552.8070102@my.hennepintech.edu> <CAE63ME474RefGOK=30sja4XPF3JOVAbdK64YaOai3ZmnoP%2BJtw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2015.01.18 10:05, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 17 January 2015 at 16:52, Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu > <mailto:aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu>> wrote: > > On 2015.01.17 09 <tel:2015.01.17%2009>:24, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BASE ? > > > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > > > I for one, would very much like it. > What advantage does it have over svnlite(1)? > > > Andrew, Emmanuel, > > > I wouldn't know, first time I hear of the binary. > > It may be failure on my part but I do not remember having read about it in any > of the handbook's pages either. > It is new for 10.0. I thought the handbook had been updated, but apparently not. There is an outstanding PR, however: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194080
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54BBE9A4.80300>