Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:40:31 +0200 From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIMAGE and pf? Message-ID: <30F13111-4ED7-412C-9F08-93340D51A633@lassitu.de> In-Reply-To: <4DFD67F0.3010508@freebsd.org> References: <0A8B9BF3-8401-4541-9FBD-0C292149C5E4@lassitu.de> <4DFD67F0.3010508@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 19.06.2011 um 05:07 schrieb Julian Elischer: > On 6/18/11 3:53 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote: >> Is VIMAGE supposed to be compatible with pf? On r223207 (8-stable) I'm getting a panic when pfctl loads the rules: > > > no they are not compatible.. there are comatibilty patches but we have so far failed to get them into the tree. Aw, too bad. I'm trying to get some processes, maybe a full jail, to use a seperate ADSL (PPPoE) connection as their default route, and I'm a bit flummoxed by the options. It seems that pf won't allow me to reference jails in rules (according to pf.conf(5)), but I could have those processes run as a certain user. Alternatively, I think I should be able to use setfib(1) with ROUTETABLES. Any advice on how I would configure mpd5 and/or a jail? Thanks, Stefan -- Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Fon +49 151 14070811
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?30F13111-4ED7-412C-9F08-93340D51A633>