Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:19:47 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 mp_machdep.c src/sys/amd64/include cpufunc.h src/sys/i386/i386 mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include cpufunc.h Message-ID: <20050515111947.GA40261@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <97079.1116154766@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <4286E6A5.4030902@freebsd.org> <97079.1116154766@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote.. > In message <4286E6A5.4030902@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival writes: > >Nate Lawson wrote: > >> That is at best, hyperbole. > > > >Have you been talking to Intel lately? > > > >> Crypto implementations which properly > >> implement blinding or operate in constant time are not vulnerable. > > > >Crypto implementations which implement blinding are vulnerable. > > This is not just about crypto. > > There are many processes which a random process should not be allowed > to spy on in a multiuser system. > > Your boss text-procssing or email program for one thing. Or the other way around for that matter :) -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050515111947.GA40261>