Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 May 2008 19:42:00 +0200
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To:        Chagin Dmitry <chagin.dmitry@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID:  <20080521174200.GA15241@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805211216580.5183@ora.chd.net>
References:  <200805191106.m4JB6oBF011533@freefall.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805210101470.4552@ora.chd.net> <20080521080422.GA69849@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805211216580.5183@ora.chd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:39:01PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Roman Divacky wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:09:17AM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> >>On Mon, 19 May 2008, FreeBSD bugmaster wrote:
> >>
> >>>Current FreeBSD problem reports
> >>>Critical problems
> >>>Serious problems
> >>>
> >>>S Tracker      Resp.      Description
> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>o kern/21463   emulation  [linux] Linux compatability mode should not 
> >>>allow setu
> >>>o kern/97326   emulation  [linux] file descriptor leakage in linux 
> >>>emulation
> >>>o kern/117010  emulation  [linux] linux_getdents() get something like 
> >>>buffer ove
> >>>
> >>
> >>about 117010...
> >>Can somebody test this patch on amd64 and i386?
> >>It is necessary linux_base-f8, 2.6.16, -current.
> >
> >can you describe the idea behind the patch? why do you think
> >it's correct to replace fcntl64 with fcntl args?
> >
> 
> this diff from linux64 port, therefore in it a lot of not concerning 
> to getdents(), but it will not prevent test
> 
> fcntl64 with fcntl have identical args in linux, but linux x86-64 has 
> no fcntl64 syscall
> 
> to getdents concerns only changes of ino member of struct l_dirent,
> essence in that i too had problem with getdents. and i have not 
> understood after what changes it have worked correctly. it disturbs me.

so.. you are saying that you dont know why but it fixes the problem for
you. right?

btw.. your git repo seems to be down



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080521174200.GA15241>