Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:07:32 -0800 (PST) From: John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, jroberson@chesapeake.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, tegge@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 Snapshots in 6.1-Beta4 - Confirmed Problems Message-ID: <20060323110458.W55763@kozubik.com> In-Reply-To: <20060323185717.GA85305@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060320224313.O55763@kozubik.com> <20060323183414.GA84775@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060323103850.S55763@kozubik.com> <20060323185717.GA85305@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris, et al., On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I ran a (completion of) your script in a loop for about 24 hours and > > > it didn't deadlock. This may be because there was a second set of > > > fixes that was merged in to 6.x a day or two ago. Are you able to > > > confirm whether they indeed fixed this problem? > > > > What ratio of snapshots / rms did you run ? > > 3/3, as you suggested. Ok. If you have code that is newer than the 6.1-BETA4 ISO that I downloaded to do my tests with, then perhaps it is fixed. Could you try it one more time, though, with: 8 snapshots / 4 rms ? If it lives through that, doing big rms of source trees on the FS that is snapshotted (8 times), then I guess it is fixed. Thanks. ----- John Kozubik - john@kozubik.com - http://www.kozubik.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060323110458.W55763>