Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:47:21 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/linux-f8-openmotif Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20090513004721.18069f27@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4A09EC91.90508@p6m7g8.com> References: <200905121614.n4CGEiv0012670@repoman.freebsd.org> <4A09AA55.8080108@p6m7g8.com> <03260409@bb.ipt.ru> <20090513003531.29453ee6@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4A09EC91.90508@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] [ context restored ] On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:39:29 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> wrote: > > > > I thought you always had to BUMP PORTREVISION when changing DEPENDS > > > > since you directly affect the resultant package ? Can you enlighten > > > > me ? > > > > > > Two arguments: > > > . the package for this port is never built; > > In general, this argument is is wrong, as one can use > > FORCE_PACKAGES to build them locally. > > Why do you even need to force it? Unless NO_PACKAGE is in the > Makefile $ make package Yes, NO_PACKAGE is the case I was talking about. I didn't review the actual commit / port in question. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkoJ7mkACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeWn1gCeK9rfxdStbCi+k8IjJTFCgQnz IDIAoLMgPBpyW1y9Uh/P1B6BiGgTubqg =yra6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090513004721.18069f27>