Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:35:05 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Freebsd Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) Message-ID: <20030924153505.GF57702@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030924152729.GC57702@madman.celabo.org> References: <3F71396A.6070508@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309241029001.26896-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030924152729.GC57702@madman.celabo.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:27:29AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> At link time, either (a) I want *this* threaded library damnit, or (b)
^^^
> that one threading library might provide but not another.
^^^^
As an aside, apparently I couldn't (or at least didn't) decide
between `threaded library' and `threading library'. I wasn't trying to
make some subtle distinction here :-) Probably I should have said
`thread library' throughout.
Cheers,
--
Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal
nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030924153505.GF57702>