Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 04:41:12 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: KSE signal problems still Message-ID: <XFMail.20020703044112.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207022137530.549-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03-Jul-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> Erm, I thought I changd signotify() to require sched_lock and made the >> second half of psignal() (the whole case statement) lock sched_lock. >> Did you change that? (To Julian) > > psignal as a whole hasn't existed in the KSE tree since December. > > I must have missed it in the complicated merge that came from that in P4. > > I just checked it in like this for now to stop > the panics until I can work out what he equivalent > change to your is.. > > (feel free to check out the new psignal/tdsignal > combination.) Well then it must be full of races then that were fixed since DP1. *sigh* I wonder how many other things were lost and need to be reimplemented. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020703044112.jhb>