Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:35:22 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Subject: Re: Silly IRQ allocation on Dell 1950 Message-ID: <2a41acea0611020935q44bcd08dxe91deb6e6e7a5fe5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <454A1E47.9060200@samsco.org> References: <XFMail.20061102080327.jdp@polstra.com> <454A1E47.9060200@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/2/06, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > This is typical Dell, and it gets even worse if you have a laptop. > Imagine every PCI device being on the sole interrupt line that is routed > on the motherboard. Growing MSI support would get around this for bce > and many other devices. > > Scott Well, guess we need stronger fertilizer so it grows faster :) Seriously though, MSI implementation is happening. The em driver wants it also :) Jack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2a41acea0611020935q44bcd08dxe91deb6e6e7a5fe5>