Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 06:32:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Luoqi Chen <luoqi@watermarkgroup.com> To: dfr@nlsystems.com, jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, mike@ducky.net Subject: Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was Re: Stuck in "objtrm") Message-ID: <199907121032.GAA14268@lor.watermarkgroup.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> We don't need the lock prefix for the current SMP implementation. A lock > prefix would be needed in a multithreaded implementation but should not be > added unless the kernel is an SMP kernel otherwise UP performance would > suffer. > > -- > Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com > Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 > Lock prefix should be added to kernel modules if we want a single set for both SMP and UP. -lq To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907121032.GAA14268>