Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:07:43 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice 1.1 port build fails. Message-ID: <20050106110743.GA39552@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050106.163617.730553156.chat95@mac.com> References: <20050104181315.GA54570@osiris.chen.org.nz> <20050104205820.GH34222@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050104214441.GA38084@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050106.163617.730553156.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2005-Jan-06 16:36:17 +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: >I recieved many many e-mails about openoffice.org 1.1.3 port build fails. >like ./install is not found ... >Solution >o cvsup your port tree and upgrade gcc32 to gcc 3.2.3_2 and > rebuild OOo again. I disagree. I ran into the problem whilst trying to build OOo from scratch (no ports installed but an up-to-date ports tree) in early January on 5.3. >2. a peson who upgarded gcc32 to 3.2.3_2 and build ooo after 2004/12/18, > s/he doesn't have a problem with building OOo. This isn't true at least for 5.3: gcc 3.2.3_2 still tries to link OOo against both libc_r and libpthread. As far as I can tell, the patch obrien@ committed to gcc32 on 19/12 broke threads on 5.3. -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050106110743.GA39552>