Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:28:45 +1100 From: nil000@cse.unsw.edu.au To: niranjan@monsoonrain.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost" Message-ID: <400BDB8D.4070807@cse.unsw.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <1074451944.400ad5e888ba4@www.monsoonrain.net> References: <4009C0D5.2070209@cse.unsw.edu.au> <1074451944.400ad5e888ba4@www.monsoonrain.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
niranjan@monsoonrain.net wrote: [ ... ] > >>Short of actually fixing this LQR negotiation issue (?), might the >>suggestion of a ppp.conf option to force LCP echo usage be good? >> > > > Yes. I am surprized it doesn't already have that option since thats > a more common scenario. Alternately you could use another pppoe > implementation, perhaps the one based on pppd/netgraph. > > BTW, the lcp.c patch suggested by someone else is not the correct > approach. > > There also seems to be a problem with the way the FreeBSD kernel PPP > implementation handles LQR and you can see it in the log below. (The > unisphere at the other end isn't perfect either and has its own > issues!) > > regards, > niranjan > Thanks for your analysis Niranjan. Could you please elaborate on what you meant about the lcp.c patch not being the correct approach? I think Mike has tested it in multiple situations, and it has worked well for a guy in the same situation down here too. cheers, nik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?400BDB8D.4070807>