Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:38:31 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new NSS Message-ID: <20030417153830.GA13319@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <200304171535.h3HFZEFs094589@strings.polstra.com> References: <20030417141133.GA4155@madman.celabo.org> <1050590195.76150.8.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com> <20030417144449.GA4530@madman.celabo.org> <200304171535.h3HFZEFs094589@strings.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:35:14AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > You might want to look at how libpam handles this situation. In the > static case, all of the known modules are linked into it statically. > Then they are located and registered at runtime by means of a linker > set. Something similar is supported. You edit src/lib/libc/net/nss_backends.h to add your module. You don't likely want to do this with large things like nss_ldap :-) but I plan to bring nss_winbind into the base system in that fashion (nss_winbind is fairly small stub). Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030417153830.GA13319>