Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:15:28 -0700 From: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HTTP POST Message-ID: <20080212161528.GB94543@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20080212075434.S1566@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080211171152.S4377@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080211173958.W4493@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200802120307.m1C376AX007592@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20080212075434.S1566@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:57:14AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> If it is the bytes on the network, I have no answer. > > bytes on network. i want to write my own www server, actually i already > wrote, with working everything except post. It is definitely fun, but why won't you use www/lighttpd instead? Lighty is an excellent super fast web server with an extremely small memory footprint. I fell in love with it a few years ago, and migrated most Apache-based sites I manage to it, because they don't need all the extra bells and whistles. > things got much nicer than using apache+cgi, it's 100 times simpler and > faster to have it all in single program > > when it will have this tested, i will make cutdown version just to serve > static pages, to replace apache in 95% of cases :) That's exactly where lighttpd excels at: serving static content very efficiently, even for very high bandwidth sites. ;) Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080212161528.GB94543>