Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:52:31 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] cpu time accounting patch, step 2 Message-ID: <6155.1139601151@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:36:10 EST." <17388.60202.862312.337026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <17388.60202.862312.337026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>, Andrew Gallatin writes: >I think you nailed the biggest source of overhead, but there is >apparently a lot more performance that we can get out of the hardware. >I'd love to see you commit this. I will, but I need to sort out a few minor details first. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6155.1139601151>